Search This Blog

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Worth of things



Mostly it is loss which teaches us about the worth of things;  

Today my grandmother passed away and so with this a whole generation from which I come from is no longer there. It’s not grief but a sense of loss which fills me up.

Genetics tells us how closely we are bound together, all of us, from the tribal people of Peru to Aborigines of Australia. Everything resides in us. All that millions of years of evolution could encode into our genes is within all of us. Yet it’s Death which snaps us makes us wonder the importance of life. 

Why do I have this sense of loss? I wasn’t close to her. I had never lived with her. All I did was spent a few days here and there on vacations. But still there is a pang in my heart today. She was last of my grandparents. My paternal Granddad had passed away when I was pretty young and was living with my other grandparents, so I didn’t feel the loss. Both my maternal grandparents passed away in the US when I was in India so again it wasn’t in front of me.  So, this one seems a little more real to me.

This loss is isn’t the one with sentiments and I am not crying. But it is something practical, something like a loss of a possession that you loved. You feel bad but you accept it. You realise that you won’t get it back and yet you can’t get over the feeling of loss.

Why, what is pomp, rule, reign, but earth and dust?
And, live we how we can, yet die we must.

Over the course of even my life the medical care system has improved dramatically, the Death is no longer in our face. Either it is very sudden or prolonged in old age. Humanity is close to solving the biggest problems in Physics, we are shooting for Mars and beyond. Technology is not only reaching the deepest parts of the world but is making a level playing field for everyone. No longer only can the rich contribute to the world but now it is in the grasp of anyone and everyone to make this planet better. However, if I have to choose what the greatest achievement for us, it has to be, 'Medical care'. Today, if something sudden or dramatic doesn’t happen most people live up to a ripe old age. They see their children and grandchildren grow up. 

My ‘Dadi’ passed away at the age of 97, she had seen her grandparents and became great-great-grandmother in her life. As middle class Indians we couldn’t have imagined that even 25 years ago.
However the question is where it would end or are we just at the beginning of a revolution which will enhance life to a point where it would seem unending. Maybe and I hope so, I know it would bring a lot of social issues but we should try it. It's worth giving people a life, long enough for them to fulfil all their dreams. This is a cause worth dying for.

For in that sleep of death what dreams may come.

Who was she? This has been a question which has been with me for a long time. I know a lot about my other three grandparents. I had physically seen their brothers and sisters, their families and hence they seemed real. But not my ‘Dadi’, she seemed alone.

She was a beautiful woman, tall. Almost 5’6 and with my granddad being 6’1, they formed a handsome couple. She herself always said that she was plump when she got married. But she was beautiful, very fair by Indian standards, almost translucent olive. This you can see today too, in my Aunt, my cousins and even their daughters. They all look beautiful and gorgeous. They all have lovely Indian features. I guess my Dad gets his better looks from her rather than my Granddad. Though how I wished at least he would have got their tall genes too. I don’t know what mutant got into my Dad which made him short.  

I know from my Dad that she had brothers and sisters and even that when I was very young had gone once to her brother’s home. Where did she come from? What was her childhood like? Was she happy child or a naughty child? How was her transition from childhood to being a wife, mother and then grandmother? But more importantly, did she lead a happy life? I guess these are the question I would never be able to answer. But no one can go back and change that, it is here and now.

Her life was a simple one, almost all her life was spent in a little area in a remote part of India. Got married into a fairly rich family but lived most of her best years in poverty. Over time things eased out and day to day worries weren’t an issue. She was allergic to fire and hence couldn’t cook in the old ‘Chulha’ and so when my Aunt got married, cooking became my father’s job. He wasn’t very fond of it though. My grandfather was very fond of eating fish, and my father had to clean and cook it for him every other day. One day my father snapped and refused to clean and cook fish for my grandfather, since that day my father rarely eats fish.   

But, what did I lose today? Is it snapping of that genetic history or something more than that. I guess we are more than our genetic makeup. What we learn, what we make of ourselves. I know one thing for sure I will be denied of her mouth watering ‘Bijouras’ from now on for sure, I am sure no one can copy her recipe of these ‘Spicy Sesame Seed Crispy’.  Or her ‘Achaar’, she made them so different from others. I wish somehow this knowledge could have been preserved in its authentic form.    

As we are becoming a global village we seem to be losing the diversity which was created by people living in smaller pockets across the globe. Even when there was exchange of knowledge it was in small vicinity. This did lead to the development of highly diverse cultures, customs, cuisines and even languages. The globalization and standardization are threatening it at a very rapid pace.  I don’t know is it a good thing or bad, this is something only an anthropologist can tell better. However, I know with my ‘Dadi’, her recipes of ‘Bijoura’ and ‘Badi’ are gone. 

I and my cousin will never laugh at her when she used to question us on how did we know that when man lands on the moon, the people there do not hide or turn into stone with fear. Even as a kid I was more astonished than fearful of her belief in ghosts and all her ghost stories. She would tell tales of her encounters with them and also about a lot of all the people she knew.

na jayate mriyate va kadacin
nayam bhutva bhavita va na bhuyah
ajo nityah sasvato 'yam purano
na hanyate hanyamane sarire

The soul never takes birth and never dies at any time,
Nor does it come into being again when the body is created.
The soul is birthless, eternal, imperishable and timeless and
Is never terminated when the body is terminated.

Mythology is an important way to understand the history. It is these stories which tell us what our forefathers thought of the world around them. Throughout the history of India many people believed in them and many didn’t. Gautam Buddha discarded a lot of prevalent mythology of his times, he was even against the concept of God but times change and his followers have created his own myths now. However, they are an important source of history; they tell us the evolution of thought for humanity. In Hinduism the difference between a human, a God (‘Deva’) and a demon (‘Asura’) wasn’t much and hence the interplay has been very interesting. Of course Death plays a very important part of these texts.

Hinduism always had been different than other religions when it comes to Death. The concept of soul and the five elements make it significantly different than especially the western tree of religions. Though the concept of Hell came into it very late through the inclusion of scriptures like Garuda Puran. The older texts like Vedas only refer to ‘Narak’ as a place of darkness where souls go to expunge their sins. The western style Hell is only in the Garuda Purana. But the concept of Heaven has always been there and what makes it interesting is that in Hinduism, Gods are not the omnipotent, omni-benevolent and omniscience, they are just elevated souls. They suffer from the same frailty and hence common souls can fight them and challenge them. Hence to imbibe the concept of hell into the theology has always been difficult. Even ‘Yama’, the ruler of the ‘Narak’ is not evil, he is compassionate. Though, his job is to take the souls but only temporarily. Heaven is also not the same, it is just considered a great place to live and in mythology various Kings have not only made their kingdoms better than Heaven but also have sometimes conquered it. You can’t even spend eternity there, there is an expiry date to it and you got to come back to earth to do your duties again.    

We cannot hold mortality's strong hand.

Her last few days were troubled, though she could breathe on her own but yet all her other senses were gone. She didn’t open her eyes for last one week, didn’t speak and had to be fed. She had bedsores too. Though, yesterday, she did open her eyes and said something to my father and uncle, it was incomprehensible. 

I have never been afraid of my own death but I don’t want a slow death, I wish that I die in the heat of things, maybe an airplane accident or just pop off somewhere without anyone knowing about it. 

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rage at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.”

However, Now at the end of her life a part of her lives in me and all of us cousins and it would be so in the generation after us. This is how she still lives on, in us. Now it is for us to make our lives and this world better.  

A Hymn from Rig Veda, which glorifies life even in death. It astonishes me that this was written almost 3000 years ago. This shows the continuation of humanity from one to another. 

परं म्रत्यो अनु परेहि पन्था यस्ते स्व इतरो देवयानात ई I 
चक्षुष्मते श्रन्वाते ते ब्रवीमि माँ नः प्रजां रीरिषो मोत वीरान II
म्र्त्योः पदं योपयनतो यदैत द्रघीय आयुः प्रतर् दधानाः I  
आप्याय्मानाः प्रजया धनेन शुद्धाः पूता भवत यज्ञियासः II


Go hence, O Death, pursue thy special pathway apart from that which Gods are wont to travel.
 

To thee I say it who hast eyes and hearest: Touch not our offspring, injure not our heroes.

As ye have come effacing Mrtyu's (Death’s) footstep, to further times prolonging your existence,
 

May ye be rich in children and possessions. cleansed, purified, and meet for sacrificing.
 

Divided from the dead are these, the living: now be our calling on the Gods successful.
 

We have gone forth for dancing and for laughter, tofurther times prolonging our existence.
 

Here I erect this rampart for the living; let none of these, none other, reach this limit.
 

May they survive a hundred lengthened autumns, and may they bury Death beneath this mountain.
 

As the days follow days in close succession, as with the seasons duly come the seasons,
 

As each successor fails not his foregoer, so form the lives of these, O great Ordainer.
 

Live your full lives ap! find old age delightful, all of you striving one behind the other.
 

May Tavshta, maker of fair things, be gracious and lengthen out the days of your existence.

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

LOVE?



Ever wondered what Love actually is, I don’t mean love that a parent has for their child because that is the only true unrequited love. I don’t even consider love the other way around, no child can ever love their parents as much as they love them. I am talking about love that we see in the movies, love that is projected on television and love that is between a man and a woman, That Love.

Oxford dictionary defines it as ‘A strong feeling of affection’, Affection as ‘A gentle feeling of fondness’ and Fondness as ‘Affection or liking someone or something’, this convoluted way of explaining a human emotion tells me that even these linguist haven’t been able to define it clearly.  

We all know that these definitions seem incomplete. Every one of us has had many crushes and loves. Most of us have felt the agony and the pain of losing it and those who haven’t, are blessed. 

I was confronted with this question sitting on LIRR going towards Manhattan. There was a couple, mid 20s, economically challenged if not poor but madly in love. They were standing just outside the carriage door and hugging, kissing and not letting each other go.  As and when people passed by them to come into the coach they just smiled and gave them a little space. They never came inside. But a lady who was sitting next to me on the first seat was staring at them with a look of amusement. She must be in her mid 40s, a big diamond was telling me that not only she was married but she looked a part of the Long Island community. Well dressed with a designer bag in her hand she was quite a sight. Here, I am thinking that the Gatsby era might have long gone but Long Island still hosts people who are financially secure. Though, the egalitarianism of New York public transport puts a variety of individuals in close proximity like this person next to me and the folks she was staring so intently. The staring was very unlike New York, I thought.

Suddenly she turns to me even when I am faking my deep engrossment in the book that I am carrying, says, “They look happy.”   

I felt relieved; I can now have a conversation instead of staring at her from the corner of my eye. I raised my head to look at them and nodded in affirmation. 

Her next question was baffling in a way but explained me a lot more than those words, “Do you think it will last?” I was puzzled. 

This time I looked at the couple with more intensity as if to see if I can find clues to answer that question. I honestly couldn’t, I wanted to believe that it would last but I knew that the world is a much harsher place than we tend to accept. 

I still didn’t speak, just shrugged my shoulder as if to say, ‘Sorry, tough question, do not know the answer.’ She smiled with an air of uncertainty, as if she was about to say something, then she paused for a few seconds and spoke again, “We were like this, me and my husband, just out of college, madly in love and got married right out of the university, moved to New York. Now I have a family, my daughter will be college in a few years and everything I imagined my life would be when I was young. But no love left.”

Now I felt sad for her, had more insight into that staring, that desire to talk to someone, that pang of jealousy that she might have felt towards that girl and above all that feeling of life passing without much ado. The rest of the journey was a blur, we didn’t even realise when our couple had gotten off as I was busy exchanging trivial pleasantries of my life with my sad but charming fellow passenger. Getting off at the Penn station we merged into Manhattan.   

But the story didn’t die there, it was at the back of my mind and when I asked myself, ‘What is love?’, the first thing that came to my mind wasn’t someone that I love or I had loved and neither a story from my own life but something that I had observed a long time ago. Why, did that incident, an incident which I had forgotten percolated through the maze of my memory and popped up is a question, whose answer,  no one would ever know. But my guess is that I associate Love with this episode.          

It was late 1980’s, for some reason that world seems far removed when I look back, almost like a dream and as if it really didn’t happen. The air in India was of restlessness. I really can’t place a date so I am not sure if Rajiv Gandhi was still the prime minister or V.P. Singh had already ascended on an anti corruption movement. However, the ground reality was, economy was as stifled as its people, I am not even sure that which was lower the growth rate of the country or the expectation of the public.

You were feeling, ‘Something’s Gotta Give’.

I was in my early teens, Steffi Graf and Gabriela Sabatini posters were already up on my walls. I had my crushes and had started to understand that most pleasurable of sins. Though we lived in MHOW but on that day I was with my father at the Bhopal railway station.

The railways are a lifeline of India, they still are. Its stations were a microcosm of India and the face of that city. From language to cuisine to magazine shops gave us the picture of where in the country we were and yet it bounded us together. They also brought in a lot of poverty; most shanty towns were built around them. As you travel across India you realise that poor people tend to live close to these railway tracks. The Bhopal station also had its share of homeless and beggars.

Like everything else poverty in India is also Grand. I am not talking about the western view of our slums but the hard fact of coping up with the humongous population which tries to survive on one meal a day. Poverty in India also has many layers, a poor is not just a poor. He or she is poor with many shades of grey. One of the great quotes that I had read somewhere came from Premchand, the great Urdu/Hindi writer. He had written, ‘That year they became so poor that even beggars started to go empty handed from their door.’ That’s India for you, where sometimes it is more humiliating not to be able to give alms to a beggar than begging itself.

The Bhopal Junction station is situated in a poor neighbourhood of Old Bhopal, it seemed quite far when I was young.  Though like most stations there are two sides for you to enter but we always used the old Bhopal area through the Hamidia Road. The entrance to the station is actually very narrow and though Bhopal had autos since the time I can remember but mostly this alley was used by ‘Tongawallas’, a tonga is single horse driven carriage, which has become a rarity now. There were lots of small shops on one side and the 10 ft. high iron fence on the other. This was to bifurcate the road to the station. This is the kind of iron fence that symbolizes railway stations across India. In those days the road wasn’t wide, must be around 20 ft at the mouth. As you came in it turned narrower and then  turned into a paved platform before you could enter the main gate of the station. The shops on the other side sold all kinds of trinkets, from lock & chains to samosas, from soap strips to paan.

It was dusk, how do I know? It’s because in those days I suffered from a weird melancholy at this hour. It was much much later when I was in the US I realised that it was because of lack of brightness in our evening lights. Our electrical lights barely used to glow, they brightened enough for us to see, but actually never enough for us to be happy, we had to wait for the Sun to rise the next day for that. As each of these shops started to turn on their lights with old style incandescent bulbs, instead of things becoming brighter they became sadder.   

On this platform I was standing leaning against the same iron fence, with the train platform right behind me, I could peek inside and see that there was no train on the platform. Daddy had gone inside for some work, I can’t recollect what was it, did we go to buy some tickets or to pick someone up but I was left outside just to hang around. Everything around me seemed dull the platform was empty, there was no train at the platform and the way things looked there was none that was scheduled to come. Most stations become quiet and dull and then crescendo of people and noise picks up to a very high crest from this low trough when a train arrives. It's a sight to behold, you can't imagine from where have these people suddenly turned up.

I was standing amongst a few homeless people. Most of them sitting with their back to the station and carrying all their stuff. You can clearly identify them as compared to the passengers who were temporarily using this platform as their refuge. I hadn’t seen her yet or even if I did I was paying no attention to her.

He was the one I observed first, coming across from the other side he walked with caution. It seemed he was coming right at me but his eyes were somewhere else. Though he didn’t give any negative vibe I didn’t like him. He looked poor but not as poor. He was clean and but not clean enough. Wearing a shirt and trouser, they were clean too but not as if they had been washed and ironed the same day. However, I knew he was underprivileged, but surely better off than all the homeless around me. I thought, he looked in his mid 20s, not young but not old either. He wasn’t wearing any kind of porter's uniform so I assumed that he didn’t work in the station, though it was clear that his livelihood was dependent on the Station.

He came right at me and even before I could get alarmed he sat down right next to me, almost squatting. This is when I observed her for the first time. She was sitting right next to where I was standing. She must have been around 18 to 20 years old. She was surely poorest of the poor, really at the bottom of that grey scale. She was haggard and unclean, her clothes were dirty and her hair matted and tangled. Her face was dirty and dry. Yet, she was charming. You could make out she was good looking and had a twinkle in her eye as if to say ‘I still have not been beaten by this life’. She sat there with all her belongings, but I could make out that she had family around.

As soon as this guy sat in front of her I was alarmed, I wanted to save her, somehow I felt he didn’t mean right or was it because I had found her attractive enough. Don’t know but I felt uncomfortable.

He spoke to her, “Tu mujhe bahut achchi lagti hai.” (“I like you a lot”)

She looked at him and smiled.

I became more comfortable now. Maybe it was the tone of his voice or maybe what he said, I felt like he really liked her.          

He looked at her again, looked intently and said, “Mujhe se shadi kar le” (“Marry me”)

She still didn’t say anything, she just lowered her eyes, I could tell there was a feeling of admiration in what he had said.

He repeated it again, “Mujhe se shadi kar le” (“Marry me”)

He waited for a few seconds for her to respond, and when she didn’t he spoke again, “Dekh, tu mujhe sach mein bahut achchi lagti hai, mujhe se shadi kar le to main yahan basti mein qamra le loonga, mere ghar bana de” (“See, I really like you, marry me, if you will marry me, I will take a room in this area, make me a home”). 

He was pointing towards the slum at the back of the railway station. She looked up as if she likes what she is hearing but she still didn’t say anything. However, her smile was a little wider with appreciation.

He felt a bit better I guess and then he said which has made this narration possible, it has stuck with me for all these years. He looked at her again and said, “Hum qamra le lenge to tujhe yahan nahin rahna padega, mujhe bilkul achcha nahin lagta ki tujhe yahan rahna padta hai, yahan sona padta hai.”  (“If we take a room you don’t have to live here, I don’t like it that you have to live here and sleep here.”)

That made sad and happy at the same time. There was a pang in my heart then and there is a twinge in my heart now. That was it, I actually do not remember what happened after that, I don’t know if I walked away or Daddy came by, I don’t know if she ever said ‘Yes’ to the guy. I don’t even know if religion came between them because it was obvious to me that she wasn’t of the majority religion as he was, but my guess is that is not why she would have refused. It didn’t matter to her when she looked at him.

Though I want to believe that she agreed, he found a room and a job, they had children which grew up in a better environment than their parents. They would be around 20 years old, and they would grow up in a different India. They would live where days are bright and evenings brighter, where the hope for a successful future is still alive, and the young India which could be brash but has the confidence to take on the world.   

But above all I want to hope that they would inherit the guy’s charm & empathy and the girl’s grit & perkiness.  

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Education 1

These will be series of snippets of my thoughts on Education system. Some thoughts will be mine but most of it will be borrowed from people who have better understanding of the subject.

This is excerpt from the essay ‘Who Are You and What Are You Doing Here?’ Written by Mark Edmundson, Professor @ University of Virginia

I really liked this piece and thought of sharing it everyone. I wish most parents have this courage with their children. I hope I am not violating any publication copyright, if so I would remove it from my blog.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Who Are You and What Are You Doing Here?’

I came to college with few resources, but one of them was an understanding, however crude, of how I might use my opportunities there. This I began to develop because of my father, who had never been to college—in fact, he’d barely gotten out of high school. One night after dinner, he and I were sitting in our kitchen at 58 Clewley Road in Medford, Massachusetts, hatching plans about the rest of my life. I was about to go off to college, a feat no one in my family had accomplished in living memory. “I think I might want to be pre-law,” I told my father. I had no idea what being pre-law was. My father compressed his brow and blew twin streams of smoke, dragon-like, from his magnificent nose. “Do you want to be a lawyer?” he asked. My father had some experience with lawyers, and with policemen, too; he was not well-disposed toward either. “I’m not really sure,” I told him, “but lawyers make pretty good money, right?”
My father detonated. (That was not uncommon. My father detonated a lot.) He told me that I was going to go to college only once, and that while I was there I had better study what I wanted. He said that when rich kids went to school, they majored in the subjects that interested them, and that my younger brother Philip and I were as good as any rich kids. (We were rich kids minus the money.) Wasn’t I interested in literature? I confessed that I was. Then I had better study literature, unless I had inside information to the effect that reincarnation wasn’t just hype, and I’d be able to attend college thirty or forty times. If I had such info, pre-law would be fine, and maybe even a tour through invertebrate biology could also be tossed in. But until I had the reincarnation stuff from a solid source, I better get to work and pick out some English classes from the course catalog.
“How about the science requirements?”
“Take ’em later,” he said, “you never know.”
My father, Wright Aukenhead Edmundson, Malden High School Class of 1948 (by a hair), knew the score. What he told me that evening at the Clewley Road kitchen table was true in itself, and it also contains the germ of an idea about what a university education should be. But apparently almost everyone else—students, teachers, and trustees and parents—sees the matter much differently. They have it wrong.
.
.
.
For the power that is in you, as Emerson suggested, may be new in nature. You may not be the person that your parents take you to be. And—this thought is both more exciting and more dangerous—you may not be the person that you take yourself to be, either. You may not have read yourself aright, you can find out whether you have or not. The reason to read Blake and Dickinson and Freud and Dickens is not to become more cultivated, or more articulate, or to be someone who, at a cocktail party, is never embarrassed (or who can embarrass others). The best reason to read them is to see if they may know you better than you know yourself. You may find your own suppressed and rejected thoughts flowing back to you with an “alienated majesty.” Reading the great writers, you may have the experience that Longinus associated with the sublime: You feel that you have actually created the text yourself. For somehow your predecessors are more yourself than you are.
.
.
.
What if you arrive at college devoted to pre-med, sure that nothing will make you and your family happier than a life as a physician, only to discover that elementary-school teaching is where your heart is?
You might learn that you’re not meant to be a doctor at all. Of course, given your intellect and discipline, you can still probably be one. You can pound your round peg through the very square hole of medical school, then go off into the profession. And society will help you. Society has a cornucopia of resources to encourage you in doing what society needs done but that you don’t much like doing and are not cut out to do. To ease your grief, society offers alcohol, television, drugs, divorce, and buying, buying, buying what you don’t need. But all those too have their costs.
Education is about finding out what form of work for you is close to being play—work you do so easily that it restores you as you go. Randall Jarrell once said that if he were a rich man, he would pay money to teach poetry to students. (I would, too, for what it’s worth.) In saying that, he (like my father) hinted in the direction of a profound and true theory of learning.
Having found what’s best for you to do, you may be surprised how far you rise, how prosperous, even against your own projections, you become.



Monday, December 31, 2012

The Year End

2012 comes to an end. Though like every other year it has its good and bad phases but however it is ending on a solemn note. Living in Delhi makes you feel even closer to what has been happening here in the last couple of weeks.

On 16th of December, six men running an illegal bus gang raped a 23 year old student. She and her male friend were first beaten, she was raped and when she tried to resist, she was brutally assaulted. She was in intensive care since then and passed away last night in Singapore.

Most of us across the country are horrified and angered by what happened. Many women have been raped in the past and even after this incident there have been a few rapes across the country. But for some reason or because of the brutality of this incident, she has galvanised a mass movement. A lot of people are on the streets across the country remembering her, mourning for her and trying that the government listens to them.

The government of India was found fumbling. They had never thought a rape & murder could evoke such a nationwide response. Why did they think that they could get away with this? The answer lies in the basic tenant of governance. Till now throughout the history, the governance and the decision making has been top down.  Suddenly they felt that something has shifted from under their feet. The comfort that they are in power and hence they can dictate what they want to react to and ignore others will not work anymore.

But here is my problem, the demand that our leaders haven’t done their job or the system has failed us is OK, but the expectation that in the present system these could be solved immediately is farfetched. Everyone has their own opinion and similarly I have my own. However, I do not want into the reasons why this happened but on an important point of Governance.

There is a fabulous quote which most Indians do not understand for sure. 'Government is at its core, what we do together that we cannot do alone.'  This basically means that we need to look at the Government as something that is derived from us and not as a separate entity which functions outside us.

We need to learn to distinguish between Politics and Government. Politicians do things to remain in power, they philander, the lie, they are corrupt and sometimes they are good too. However, they are not the Government; they are at best executors of the functioning Government.

So discounting politicians, what can we do and how do we do to make the Government better and in turn the city and the country better. The important point to realize is to make the Government function well, we need to make ourselves more responsible and take the citizenship more seriously. I do not mean citizenship only in parochial country sense; I mean we all are citizens of a city and neighbourhood on one end and the world at the other.

Governments inherently have not been open and they are not attuned to collaborative processes. But we need that change of process to deal with what the technology has unleashed on us. Policies need to be created in advance of the needs. I know that laws sometimes move ahead of the society and sometime behind, but wouldn't it be a good thing if somehow we can measure the changing perception and make these changes before time. This requires values and expertise of the citizens have to be gauged and then turn them into decision.

I am not advocating that we should remove our democratic setup not even that our representative system of democracy be taken over but  there has to be a kind of 'pulse monitor' this pulse monitor measures the values and aspirations of society not on a 5 yearly basis but in short pulses, days, weeks, months. This would give us enormous edge in forming policies far quicker and get citizens involved on a regular basis. Now if there is a bill or a policy which affects farming sector, urban population might not take part in the debate or if there is a city issue, folks in the country side might not, that’s OK as far as they opportunity is provided to all. In an era of Facebook and multimedia we have the tools to get it there and make it available to people. This in no way this will replace Government and in no way I am suggesting that. But this will enable people see social trends better.

20 years ago when I was growing up, we used to get a couple of newspapers at our place, if something had happened a 1000 miles away, we could read about it the next day, feel sad or elated but there was no way for us to put our voices out to be heard. We no longer live in those times. As internet is penetrating deep inside this world and is becoming more accessible we all can voice our thoughts. So no longer we are a consumer of the information, we are creators and participators in that event.

Another important point to keep in mind is that getting information and dissipating that information is not cooperation towards governance. Today in India we have ‘Right to Information’ act, we can access  every public record if needed, but that is not enough, we need ability to do something with it, exposing it if it is wrong is not good enough anymore, we as a society need the ability to make an effective change in it or using it.

Facebook, Twitter and other social media have given us a great platform where we can interact with people across the globe. We find people with similar thoughts across the geographical boundaries and created communities where more important is to have similar taste rather than where you come from, what your social or economic status is. For example, how much ever it makes my stomach churn, Justin Bieber has 50 million fans on Facebook from all across the world. I am not saying that we should use Facebook as a tool but it gives us a great snapshot of what people are actually thinking without geographic boundaries. We can no longer be concerned about only our needs, we need to think global, as the world around us closes on us, the impact of good and bad in any part of the world would be felt right across. Today, vegetable prices change worldwide, the impact of it could be relative but still the trends move similarly.

There are many many things that we can do, I am trying to list down a couple of my ideas, let us make this forum open and let us collect ideas that could evolve into something that we can create, share and make it better.

The first thing is that we need to take onus of our surroundings. We need to build a mechanism where we all contribute to solve day to day problems. Problem could be in our neighbourhood or even our neighbour's. If I know how to fix a tap why wait for the plumber to come and help the neighbour. If there is a garbage dump near my area, why not few people combine and clean it to an extent rather than waiting for city it do it for you.

Another addition that would immensely help make our surroundings better is if we all could own a particular piece of equipment or a park bench or even a street. If we own it, we keep it in good shape, if I own a park bench; I keep it and the area around it clean so people can use it better. If I own a street, I can help install a CC TV camera, or extend the duties of guards in our restricted colonies to monitor roads around the colonies too. If an organization owns a road, they can provide better security by employing a couple of more people to make the roads safer. This way we would not only extend our cooperation to the city but make its inhabitants feel safer.

Another simple way is to make a panic application or a phone number which informs the closest police person instead of routing it to the central location.

Such ideas are a plenty, we need to contribute them, create them and use them to make our lives better. This is the new and really democratic way of governing.  Governments are needed to keep the systems in place, check and balances between different strata and the overall law and order system in place. But we can contribute and we should contribute.

So please share one idea, it could be something that if all follow we could make this better, one idea for an application, one idea that we all can pitch to the authorities. It could be anything. Let us share so that collaborate on it and actually deliver it to people across the world.

Because until we change our mindset of citizenship we won't be able to change the government. We need to be better citizens first than we can hope for a better government.

Hoping that the new year will bring happiness, prosperity and peace in everyone’s life.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

The year that killed a dream

2011 is about to go by and looking back this has been a pretty slow year on a personal front. A lot happened in the country and countries across the world. Arab world seems to have taken to streets to remove despots and autocratic regimes. Though it is a very good thing that people can still, I can’t help but wonder do they have grass root democracy to fill the void or they again will be replaced by bigots and crackpots. North Korea lost a dictator but all practical reasons was replaced by another, Cuba came very close to losing its, however, Fidel Castro is hanging on to life if not to the power itself. Imran Khan has taken a stance in Pakistan and is rallying for the next election even at the cost of being on the side of right wing politicians.

India could have a landmark year if Lokpal bill is passed, at the time of writing the lower house has passed it but the tougher battle is in the upper house. Anna Hazare started a movement on streets with the civil society and then the government was forced into taking some actions. Though we know that there are so many points of views that we would never have a unanimous decision on it but even if it comes close we should be happy. It has been hanging around for 42 years and it was high time we do something about it. In the last few years we have two legislatures which in a decade or so could become the foundation of Indian democracy in RTI and Lokpal. Like everything these would also take its own time to settle down however a redressing mechanism would be set forth.

Every time I see a mass turnout in streets in favour of any kind of revolution, I am reminded of Faiz’s classic, ‘aaj bazaar main pa bajolan chalo’

चश्मेनम जानेशोरिदां काफी नहीं
तोह्मतेइश्क़ पोशीदा काफी नहीं
आज बाज़ार में पबजोलां चलो
दस्त अफशां चलो, मस्त रुख्सां चलो
खाख बरसर चलो, खूं बदमान चलो
राह ताकता है शहरेजना चलो

Chashm-e-nam, jaan-e-shoreeda kafi nahin
Tohmat-e-ishq-posheeda kafi nahin
aaj bazaar main pa-bajolan chalo
Dast afshan chalo, mast-o-raqsan chalo
Khak bar sar chalo, khoon badaman chalo
Rah takta hai sub shehr-e-janaan chalo

Watery eyes and restless soul is not enough,
being charged for nurturing concealed love is not enough,
let us walk in the streets in shackles,
go empty handed, dancing you go,
let the dust get in your head and blood on your clothes,
the whole city is watching, now lets go


However, all was not well this year, India lost stalwarts and somehow most of them in the field of Art and Literature. In one year a generation who had inspired us were gone, Shammi Kapoor, MF Husain, Gautam Rajadhyaksha, Subhod Sarkar, Satyendra Dubey, Bhimsen Joshi, Sri Lal Shukla, Bhupen Hazarika, Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi and Jagjit Singh. Though death is a very weird feeling for me, I am not at all afraid of dying however the death of others always affects me in a profound way.

One of favourite quotes which Sartre had put it so eloquently says,

“One always dies too soon - or too late. And yet one's whole life is complete at that moment, with a line drawn neatly under it, ready for the summing up. You are - your life, and nothing else.”


Hence now we can only measure their lives with their contribution to the society and more to ourselves as individuals.

Two people who made an enormous contribution to my memories are also the ones we lost in this year. The first one was Anant Pai, or fondly Uncle Anant Pai, who had passed away in February. Anant Pai was the creator and till 1999 the Managing director of ‘Amar Chitra Katha’. In the 70s and 80s when India wasn’t liberalised and either we were bombarded with Russian books from the erstwhile USSR or hoped to get our hands on the Marvel and DC comics there was our saviour ‘Amar Chitra Katha’. The magical telling, retelling, reading and re-reading of the Indian mythology, folk tales, and biographic accounts of historical & mythical characters built my childhood memories. Like everyone of my generation we cannot take away those memories. I know most of the Indian mythology through these books can’t imagine what my life would have been without them. I think it was ‘Surya’ or Dashavatar’ which was my first ACK, today I have around 200 of them and each time I walk into a book store I keep hoping to buy the full 440+ of them. He also started ‘Tinkle’ which also became famous in the 1980s. So for all those great memories, moments and till a large extent the person I am, I owe it to Uncle Anant Pai.

This article is named ‘The year which killed a dream’. I always wanted to meet Devanand. He was my hero initially because he was cool but later because he was super-cool the way he led his life, I have always admired men, like Devanand or Khushwant Singh, who have lived there lives with honesty and dealt with their relationships with maturity. With his death that dream of meeting him has died forever, when we lose someone in a relationship we feel bad but somehow we have a feeling that we would meet them somewhere or sometime. But when someone dies that strand of hope is broken and his death at least killed that dream of mine.

Though it was quite strange that he was my hero. In early 80s when he was really past his prime people looked for Amitabh Bachchan or were hopeful of Sanjay Dutt, Anil Kapoor or Jackie Shroff. His movies were introduced to me by mother and aunts who were really fond of him. Actually everyone in my family was fond of Dev Saheb, including my father and uncles. I remember a long time ago one of my uncles came back after watching Swami Dada and was telling me its story. Though, I think my first Devanand movie was ‘Jewel Thief’ on a Sunday evening on Doordarshan and instantaneously I was hooked to the plot. Especially, during summer vacations when we all cousins got together we watched a lot of his movies on those old video cassettes. We became big fans of him. He was the coolest hero in the industry; he was that urban hero, that eternal romantic and the optimist amongst the gloom, naive or a hillbilly which Dilip Kumar or Raj Kapoor represented. But as I grew up I realised that he represented more than just that, he was a workaholic, he kept making movies even when they failed, he never looked back, never cared about failures and above all he led his life with utter honesty. Honesty doesn’t always mean that you do the right thing; it actually means that you are honest about your flaws too and that was Devanand.

A person is not only judged by himself but also by the company he keeps. He was friends with everyone including Raj Kapoor and Dilip Kumar with whom he formed the trinity of Indian Cinema. Supposedly when Dilip Kumar heard of his demise he refused to come out of his bedroom for hours. But his real close friends were, father and son duo of S.D. and R.D., Sahir Ludhianvi whom most would regard as the best poet and lyricist of the movie industry, Md. Rafi and Kishore Kumar, they all combined give some of the greatest songs in the cinema.

They gave us unmatched philosophy, heart aching sadness, the cool romance, fun & frolic, the devotion towards the almighty, the freedom of a liberated woman to the agonizing wait for death.

Of course, the list won’t be complete without mentioning the incomparable Gurudutt. The story of their friendship is very interesting, they both used to share the same laundry and one day Devanand found his shirt missing, he reached with his only other shirt, which wasn’t clean, to the studio to shoot for his first movie where he saw the choreographer wearing his shirt. When confronted the choreographer acknowledged that it wasn’t his shirt and the laundry had given him the wrong one, but he had to wear it because he had none other. They became friends and promised that Gurudutt would be his director if he made his movie and Dev would be the hero in his Gurudutt's production. Devanand gave Indians the gift of Gurudutt’s genius through Baazi and Gurudutt gave Devanand one of his biggest hits in CID.

One of the best eulogy to him was done by ‘Sontosh Desai’, in his ToI blog, called, ‘The death of time’, which ends with a line which epitomises the essence of being Devanand and the reality of Death, ‘When Dev Anand dies, you know that death is no longer playing games, it means business.’

Indian movie industry is built on songs, music and dances and that hasn’t changed over time, we romance using songs, we sing when we are sad, we tease, laugh and gloom using songs. We sing in the praise of our nation and we sing in the times of revolution. There is a song when someone gets married and there is one when someone passes away. Our movies are entrenched with them. As, Feroz Khan used to say, “The art of rendering a song on screen started with Devanand and would end with him”. Hence, here are some of my favourites which are a slice of what Devanand could do while rendering a song, this includes some of the songs from his movies which might not feature him but show the brilliance of his philosophical leanings. This is as much a tribute to Devanand as to Gurudutt, Chetan Anand, Vijay Anand, S.D. Burman, R.D. Burman, Sahir Ludhianvi, Shailendra, Md. Rafi, Kishore Kumar, Mukesh, Talat Mahmood and Hemant Kumar. None of them are with us any more.

The start of his movie carrier was dominated by his love affair with Suraiya and they sing from movie ‘Jeet’




As he lost his love, he became his own man and did movies which were way ahead of their times, here is a classic from ‘Patita’, his movies were always ahead of times.




He made a comedy thriller under his own banner Navketan called ‘Afsar’ based on Nikloi Gogol’s novel which spawned a series of crime thrillers out of Bombay. Baazi and Jaal directed by Gurudutt were big hits, Jaal showed him as an anti-hero which is as close to villain as Hindi movies could get till today.




CID, produced by Gurudutt was the biggest hit of both their carrier., but here is a song which doesn’t feature Devanand but another of their lifelong friend in Johnny Walker.





Munimji wasn’t a very big commercial hit but this song is still one the great songs sung by Kishore Kumar.



This was the start of phenomenal decade for him, which saw him reach the peak of his stardom:
1956, Paying Guest




1957, Nau Do Gyarah



1958, Kala Pani, the quintessential Devanand which paired him opposite utterly beautiful Madhubala,



or Solvan Saal opposite gorgeous Waheeda Rehman, Waheeda Rehman became his favorite actress and they worked in many more movies to come






1959, Kala Bazaar




1960, Bambai ka Babu



1961, Hum Dono, where due to S. D. Burman’s illness, his then assistant Jaidev gave immortal music to this movie, though I really like 'Allah tero naam' but here are two of my favourites







1962, Baat ek raat ki




1963 , Tere Ghar ke Samne




1964, Teen Devian




1965, Guide, Outlook magazine had carried a poll of experts in 2006 to select 20 best songs of 20th century and 2 songs from Guide were in the top 5 and 3 in top 10 and though it is very tough to choose from probably the greatest album of Indian cinema, here are 2 of them








Then later came Jewel Thief



Prem Pujari



Johnny Mera Naam



Tere Mere Sapne




And an iconic movie which gave Indians a new kind of woman, Hare Rama Hare Krishna, a movie which was a decade before its time



After this he made a lot of movies, some worked, most didn't however, my pick of the song amongst them is from Joshila,



Devanand’s life reminds me of a Harivansh Rai Bachchan’s poem and specially the final verse,

काली काले केशों में कमल सजाये
चुपके चुपके आई
मैं उजले मुंह, उजले वस्त्रों में बैठा था
पथ पर थी उजयाली छाई
तुम कौन
मौत
मैं जीने की ही जोत जुगत में लगा रहा
बोली मत घबरा स्वागत का मेरे तुने सबसे अछ्छा सामान किया
मैंने जीवन देखा
जीवन का गान किया

Kaali kaale keshon me kala kamal sajaye
chupke chupke aayee
main ujle munh, ujle vastron me baitha tha
path par thi ujyali chaayi
tum kaun
maut
main jeene ki hi jog jugat me laga raha
boli, mat ghabra, swagat ka mere tune sab se achha saaman kiya
maine jeevan dekha
jeevan ka gaan kiya


Adorning black hair with black lotus in her hair,
She came silently,
I was sitting there bright faced, wearing white clothes,
Even the way was illuminating,
Who are you?
Death, she said,
But I was so engrossed in living,
She said, Don’t worry, You have accumulated the best possessions to welcome me,
I saw life,
I lived it to the fullest